<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Closed source fanatics?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://keithperkins.net/2005/11/23/closed-source-fanatics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://keithperkins.net/2005/11/23/closed-source-fanatics</link>
	<description>Want Some Art--Come and get it.  A blog about art, technology, and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 00:36:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://keithperkins.net/2005/11/23/closed-source-fanatics/comment-page-1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 16:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithperkins.net/blog/?p=13#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Heh :D Guess CSS isn&#039;t the best acronym for Closed Source Software.... but that&#039;s another story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh <img src='http://keithperkins.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  Guess CSS isn&#8217;t the best acronym for Closed Source Software&#8230;. but that&#8217;s another story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny Axelsson</title>
		<link>http://keithperkins.net/2005/11/23/closed-source-fanatics/comment-page-1#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny Axelsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 12:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithperkins.net/blog/?p=13#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Actually I *am* a CSS fanatic, when CSS is short for Cascading Style Sheets...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I *am* a CSS fanatic, when CSS is short for Cascading Style Sheets&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://keithperkins.net/2005/11/23/closed-source-fanatics/comment-page-1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithperkins.net/blog/?p=13#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jonny.
For those that don&#039;t know. Jonny Axelsson is the Web Standards guy at Opera, and not a CSS Fanatic :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jonny.<br />
For those that don&#8217;t know. Jonny Axelsson is the Web Standards guy at Opera, and not a CSS Fanatic <img src='http://keithperkins.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny Axelsson</title>
		<link>http://keithperkins.net/2005/11/23/closed-source-fanatics/comment-page-1#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny Axelsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 21:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keithperkins.net/blog/?p=13#comment-5</guid>
		<description>It probably should be seen as a reaction to being browbeaten for years that Open Source cures cancer, and most of that thread degenerated into yet another Firefox vs Opera discussion. 

A pity really, often Open Source makes sense (and many times it does not), but it doesn&#039;t turn a bad product into a good one nor a good product into a bad one. There&#039;s been too much religion on this topic, and Open Source doesn&#039;t imply potluck programming. There have been plenty of awful Open Source projects and plenty of great and influental ones. As long as the formats and protocols are open and sane, preventing vendor lock-in, the awful software will fade away eventually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It probably should be seen as a reaction to being browbeaten for years that Open Source cures cancer, and most of that thread degenerated into yet another Firefox vs Opera discussion. </p>
<p>A pity really, often Open Source makes sense (and many times it does not), but it doesn&#8217;t turn a bad product into a good one nor a good product into a bad one. There&#8217;s been too much religion on this topic, and Open Source doesn&#8217;t imply potluck programming. There have been plenty of awful Open Source projects and plenty of great and influental ones. As long as the formats and protocols are open and sane, preventing vendor lock-in, the awful software will fade away eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

